So idk if you’ve ever expressed your opinion on this (I’m new :) ) but how do you feel about a 3p pov backstory at the beginning of a book (ex. the first chapter of harry potter if I remember right) I think my WIP could really benefit from it since it’s such a complicated world building piece so a explanation of how everything came to be might be more helpful than the readers learning with the MC but I know some people are like super against that so I just wanted to know your thoughts personally

writingquestionsanswered:

Backstory at the Beginning of a Book

Part of why this method worked with Harry Potter is because things were actually happening. It wasn’t just exposition dumped into the reader’s lap by a narrator or any number of POV characters. If you can do that, it’s probably fine. 

However, I also think it’s important to consider just how much this information matters at the beginning of the story. Is it necessary for your reader to understand how this world came to be before they start reading? Consider The Hunger Games, for example. We don’t learn about how Panem came to be before the story even starts. In fact, we get only limited details about Panem’s history as the three book series progresses. Mary E. Pearson’s Remnant Chronicles is another example. We never really learn what happened to North America and the rest of the world. We only learn the more recent history of the kingdoms occupying North America in the future, and even then, it’s not all presented in the beginning of the story. It’s woven in throughout the story as it unfolds.

Most of the time, it’s better for your reader to learn along with the MC or for the narrator/POV character to simply fill the reader in on important details as the story goes on, but ultimately it’s up to you. Follow your gut. 🙂

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.